Sunday, June 15, 2025
spot_imgspot_img

Top 5 This Week

spot_imgspot_img

Related Posts

Is AI Considered “Normal”? | MIT Technology Review

Princeton Researchers Urge a Balanced Perspective on AI Technology

In a thought-provoking essay, Princeton researchers Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor call for a more measured approach to artificial intelligence (AI), urging society to view it as a standard technology rather than a radical, autonomous entity. Their 40-page paper contends that comparing AI to historical technologies like electricity or the internet is more appropriate than likening it to nuclear weapons, though they acknowledge the limitations of such analogies.

The researchers emphasize the need to distinguish between the rapid advancements in AI research and the slower pace of its real-world applications. Kapoor argues that many discussions on AI overlook the lengthy adoption processes seen with other technologies, resulting in inflated expectations of its societal impacts. “AI’s adoption will be more of a trickle than a tsunami,” he notes.

They challenge prevalent terminology, asserting that concepts like “superintelligence” are overly speculative and should be avoided. Instead, they advocate for focusing on how AI is likely to exacerbate existing societal issues, such as inequality and labor market disruptions. Narayanan points out that AI can significantly influence capitalism, potentially worsening problems unless carefully managed.

Interestingly, the essay does not address the burgeoning use of AI in military applications, which raises critical concerns about life-and-death decision-making. The authors acknowledge the difficulty in analyzing this sector without classified data but indicate that further research is forthcoming.

The implications of treating AI as a "normal" technology could shift the prevailing narrative surrounding national security measures on AI development, contrasting with both Biden and Trump administrations’ stances that position AI innovation as a priority to maintain global leadership. The authors label the US-China "AI arms race" rhetoric as “shrill,” suggesting a need for a calmer, more rational discourse.

Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles