Saturday, July 12, 2025
spot_imgspot_img

Top 5 This Week

spot_imgspot_img

Related Posts

MI House Votes on Sanctuary Policies, Citizenship Verification, and Voter ID Requirements

Lansing Lawmakers Advance Sanctuary Policies, Reject Voter ID Proposal

GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. – As legislative tensions heightened in Lansing, lawmakers approved a controversial package concerning "sanctuary city" policies, while a proposal aimed at requiring voter identification and proof of citizenship failed to secure the necessary votes.

The newly passed legislation, comprising House Bills 4338-4342, restricts local governments from hindering law enforcement’s cooperation with federal immigration officials. State Rep. James DeSana (R-Carleton) emphasized that the bills focus on "lawfulness," threatening to withhold state funds from non-compliant municipalities.

However, concerns were raised by opposition figures like State Rep. Reggie Miller (D-Van Buren Twp.), who argued that the changes do not enhance community safety and may impede law enforcement’s primary responsibilities.

The package also seeks to limit access to state services for non-citizens and "qualified aliens," a move justified by advocates as necessary for ensuring that resources are allocated to Michigan residents. According to State Rep. Jamie Thompson (R-Brownstown Twp.), "Every dollar of food assistance, every Medicaid benefit… belongs to the residents of Michigan."

In a contrasting outcome, lawmakers rejected House Joint Resolution B (HJR B), which called for mandatory photo ID and proof of citizenship for voter registration. Although the proposal received majority support—58 votes in favor against 48 opposed—it fell short of the two-thirds threshold required for approval. Critics, like State Rep. Stephen Wooden (D-Grand Rapids), warned that similar laws in other states have disenfranchised eligible voters.

Despite the setback, House Majority Floor Leader Bryan Posthumus (R-Rockford) expressed intentions to pursue alternative routes, potentially through a ballot initiative in 2026 to bring the issue back to voters.

Note: The image is for illustrative purposes only and is not the original image associated with the presented article. Due to copyright reasons, we are unable to use the original images. However, you can still enjoy the accurate and up-to-date content and information provided.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Popular Articles